citesArticle #48837: Cites...
NeuroBiography: A database of cognitive neuroscientists' lives & work
User: Guest
Holmes NP (2017) Development and learning of the online control of reaching movements. Accelerating the impact of research into sensorimotor learning, University of Leeds, UK, 14th July  
12 Papers found...

View these results as a formatted reference list in journal styles: APA - ExpBrainRes - JNeuroPhys - NB

Sort by Year, then Author; Author then Year

1. Alstermark B, Eide E, Górska T, Lundberg A, Pettersson L' (1984) Visually guided switching of forelimb target reaching in cats. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 120(1):151-153
      [NBArticle #31126] [Cites 2] [CitedBy 23] [Delete citation]
2. Blanchard CCV, McGlashan HL, French B, Sperring RJ, Petrocochino B, Holmes NP (2017) Online control of prehension predicts performance on a standardised motor assessment test in 8-12 year old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:374
    [NBArticle #41777] [Cites 51] [CitedBy 14] [Delete citation]
3. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669):756
      [NBArticle #3985] [CitedBy 104] [Delete citation]
4. Carlton LG (1981) Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5):1019-1030
    [NBArticle #3570] [Cites 22] [CitedBy 23] [Delete citation]
5. Herter TM, Takei T, Munoz DP, Scott SH (2015) Neurons in red nucleus and primary motor cortex exhibit similar responses to mechanical perturbations applied to the upper-limb during posture. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, :29
    [NBArticle #47936] [CitedBy 6] [Delete citation]
6. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83(3):502-512
    [NBArticle #10579] [Cites 19] [CitedBy 173] [Delete citation]
7. Petersen SE, Robinson DL (1985) Pulvinar nuclei of the behaving rhesus monkey: Visual responses and their modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 54:867-886
  [NBArticle #30078] [CitedBy 7] [Delete citation]
8. Schmolesky MT, Wang Y, Hanes DP, Thompson KG, Leutgeb S, Schall JD, Leventhal AG (1998) Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(6):3272-3278
  [NBArticle #21699] [CitedBy 10] [Delete citation]
9. Scott SH (2004) Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(7):534-546
  [NBArticle #12018] [Cites 1] [CitedBy 4] [Delete citation]
10. Stein JF, Richardson A (2009) Cognitive disorders: a question of misattribution. Current Biology, 9:R374-376
  [NBArticle #48856] [CitedBy 1] [Delete citation]
11. Takeichi N, Kaneko CRS, Fuchs AF (2005) Discharge of monkey nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis neurons changes during saccade adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(3):1938-1951
    [NBArticle #47937] [CitedBy 6] [Delete citation]
12. Veerman MM, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2008) The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Experimental Brain Research, 187(2):219-228
    [NBArticle #21677] [Cites 24] [CitedBy 39] [Delete citation]