NeuroBiography: A database of cognitive neuroscientists' lives & work
User: Guest
Demchenko I, Katz R, Pratt H, Zacksenhouse M (2016) Distinct electroencephalographic responses to disturbances and distractors during continuous reaching movements. Brain Research, 1652:178-187    
• Disturbances and distractors during reaching elicit distinguishable potentials. • Frontal P3a-like positivity is evoked similarly by disturbances and distractors. • Parietal P3b-like positivity is significantly stronger in response to disturbances. • Parietal P3b-like positivity appears even in when the difference vector does not change. • ERN does not appear in ERPs synchronized to onset of any of the changes
Discrepancies between actual and appropriate motor commands, dubbed low-level errors, have been shown to elicit a P300 like component. P300 has been studied extensively in cognitive tasks using, in particular, the three-stimulus oddball paradigm. This paradigm revealed two sub-components, known as P3a and P3b, whose relative contributions depend on saliency and task-relevance, respectively. However, the existence and roles of these sub-components in response to low-level errors are poorly understood. Here we investigated responses to low level errors generated by disturbances – including target and cursor jumps, versus responses to distractors, i.e., environmental changes that are irrelevant to the reaching task. Additionally, we examined the response to matching cursor and target jumps (dual jumps), which generate estimation errors, and are thus considered task relevant disturbances, but do not generate low level errors. We found that a significant P3a-like component is evoked by both disturbances and distractors, whereas the P3b-like component is significantly stronger in response to disturbances than distractors. The P3b-like component appears also in response to dual jumps, even though there are no low level errors. We conclude that disturbances and distractors elicit distinct responses, and that the P3b-like component reflects estimation errors rather than low-level errors