NeuroBiography: A database of cognitive neuroscientists' lives & work
User: Guest
Quicksearch:
Holmes NP, Blanchard CCV, French B, McGlashan HL, Sperring RJ (2016) Sensory guidance of hand movement in adults and children: the development of online control. Action & Awareness workshop, University of Warwick, 18th March  
Actions:
11 Papers found...

View these results as a formatted reference list in journal styles: APA - ExpBrainRes - JNeuroPhys - NB

1. Alstermark B, Eide E, Górska T, Lundberg A, Pettersson L' (1984) Visually guided switching of forelimb target reaching in cats. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 120(1):151-153
      [NBArticle #31126] [Cites 1] [CitedBy 11] [Delete citation]
2. Blanchard CCV, McGlashan HL, French B, Sperring RJ, Petrocochino B, Holmes NP (2017) Online control of prehension predicts performance on a standardised motor assessment test in 8-12 year old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:374
    [NBArticle #41777] [Cites 49] [CitedBy 1] [Delete citation]
3. Buch ER, Mars RB, Boorman ED, Rushworth MFS (2010) A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(4):1395-1401
      [NBArticle #28307] [Cites 29] [CitedBy 8] [Delete citation] [2 Coordinates]
4. Cooke DF, Graziano MSA (2003) Defensive movements evoked by air puff in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(5):3317-3329
      [NBArticle #8292] [Cites 1] [CitedBy 11] [Delete citation]
5. Graziano MSA, Gross CG, Taylor CSR, Moore T (2004b) A system of multimodal areas in the primate brain. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–67
  [NBArticle #25675] [Cites 1] [CitedBy 16] [Delete citation]
6. Holmes NP, Dakwar A (2015) Online control of reaching and pointing to visual, auditory, and multimodal targets: Effects of target modality and method of determining correction latency. Vision Research, 117:105-116
        [NBArticle #34083] [CitedBy 9] [Delete citation]
7. Makin TR, Holmes NP, Brozzoli C, Rossetti YRC, Farnè A (2009) Coding of visual space during motor preparation: Approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centred coordinates. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(38):11841-11851
        [NBArticle #26460] [Cites 63] [CitedBy 58] [Delete citation]
8. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83(3):502-512
    [NBArticle #10579] [Cites 19] [CitedBy 155] [Delete citation]
9. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2004b) Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(2):148-169
    [NBArticle #10429] [Cites 78] [CitedBy 27] [Delete citation]
10. Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes NP (2008) Multisensory interactions. In: Lin MC, Otaduy MA (eds) Haptic rendering: Foundations, algorithms, and applications. AK Peters, Wellesley MA, pp 21–52
    [NBArticle #25555] [Cites 117] [CitedBy 50] [Delete citation]
11. Veerman MM, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2008) The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Experimental Brain Research, 187(2):219-228
    [NBArticle #21677] [Cites 24] [CitedBy 29] [Delete citation]