Naish KR, Reader AT, Houston-Price C, Bremner AJ, Holmes NP (2013a) To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences. Experimental Brain Research, 225(2):261-275
Actions:31 Papers found...
View these results as a formatted reference list in journal styles: APA - ExpBrainRes - JNeuroPhys - NB
1. Ansuini C, Cavallo A, Bertone C, Becchio C (2014) The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:815
2. Ansuini C, Cavallo A, Bertone C, Becchio C (2015) Intentions in the brain the unveiling of mister hyde. The Neuroscientist, 21(2):126-135
3. Ansuini C, Cavallo A, Bertone C, Becchio C (2016) Reading intention in action. In: (eds) Shared representations: sensorimotor foundations of social life., pp 374
4. Becchio C, Koul A, Ansuini C, Bertone C, Cavallo A (2017) Seeing mental states: an experimental strategy for measuring the observability of other minds. Physics of Life Reviews, :
5. Blanchard CCV, McGlashan HL, French B, Sperring RJ, Petrocochino B, Holmes NP (2017) Online control of prehension predicts performance on a standardised motor assessment test in 8-12 year old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:374
7. Catmur C (2015) Understanding intentions from actions: direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Consciousness and Cognition, 36:426-433
8. Cavallo A, Koul A, Ansuini C, Capozzi F, Becchio C (2016) Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Scientific Reports, 6:37036
9. Costa HJB (2017) Análise cinemática de pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral durante jogo de dardos em ambientes virtual e real. MSc Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 83pp.
10. Donnarumma F, Dindo H, Pezzulo G (2017) Sensorimotor coarticulation in the execution and recognition of intentional actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:237
11. Donnarumma F, Dindo H, Pezzulo G (2017) Sensorimotor communication for humans and robots: improving interactive skills by sending coordination signals. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, (99):
12. Egmose I, Køppe S (2017) Shaping of reach-to-grasp kinematics by intentions: a meta-analysis. Journal of Motor Behaviour, :1-11
13. Finisguerra A, Amoruso L, Makris S, Urgesi C (2016) Dissociated representations of deceptive intentions and kinematic adaptations in the observer's motor system. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, :
14. Flindall JW, Gonzalez CLR (2014) Eating interrupted: the effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(8):2019-2025
15. Flindall JW, Gonzalez CLR (2015) Children's bilateral advantage for grasp-to-eat actions becomes unimanual by age 10 years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133:57-71
16. Flindall JW (2017) On action intent: behavioural correlates of reach-to-grasp actions. PhD Thesis, University of Lethbridge, 195pp.
17. Holmes NP (2016) The Old Statistics, the New Statistics (then back to the Old Statistics again): Bootstrapping data in Matlab for descriptive and inferential statistics. , A16, Pope, 7th December
18. Koul A, Cavallo A, Ansuini C, Becchio C (2016) Doing it your way: how individual movement styles affect action prediction. Public Library of Science ONE, 11(10):165297
19. Lewkowicz D, Quesque F, Coello Y, Delevoye-Turrell YN (2015) Individual differences in reading social intentions from motor deviants. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1175
20. Lewkowicz D (2013) Intentionnalité et interactions motrices: comment appréhender les intentions d'autrui à partir de la dynamique comportementale? PhD Thesis, Université Charles de Gaulle-Lille III, 237pp.
21. Naish KR, Houston-Price C, Bremner AJ, Holmes NP (2014a) Are you going to eat that? action prediction by the mirror system is not based on observed movement alone. Social Cognition: Origins, Mechanisms and Disorders, University of Surrey, 28th August
22. Naish KR, Houston-Price C, Bremner AJ, Holmes NP (in preparation) Are you going to eat that? action prediction by the mirror system is not based on movement kinematics alone. European Journal of Neuroscience, 0:0
23. Ní Choisdealbha A (2016) Semantic and motor processes in infant perception of object-directed and tool-mediated action. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, 189pp.
24. Quesque F, Coello Y (2014) For your eyes only: effect of confederate’s eye level on reach-to-grasp action. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:1407
25. Quesque F, Delevoye-Turrell YN, Coello Y (2016) Facilitation effect of observed motor deviants in a cooperative motor task: evidence for direct perception of social intention in action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(8):1451-1463
26. Quesque F (2015) Montre-moi comment tu bouges, je te dirai à quoi tu penses: vers une approche incarnée de la cognition sociale. PhD Thesis, Université Charles de Gaulle-Lille III, 265pp.
27. Reader AT, Holmes NP (2015a) Video stimuli reduce object-directed imitation accuracy: a novel two-person motion-tracking approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:644
28. Reader AT, Holmes NP (2016) Examining ecological validity in social interaction: problems of visual fidelity, gaze, and social potential. Culture and Brain, 4(2):134-146
29. Reader AT (2017) Optimal motor synergy extraction for novel actions and virtual environments. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118(2):652-654
30. Rigato S, Banissy MJ, Romanska A, Thomas R, van Velzen J, Bremner AJ (2017) Cortical signatures of vicarious tactile experience in four-month-old infants. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, :